i wasn't sure what forum to post this in. i am on a lot of groups and email lists. i am surprised by how little consensus i find. part of it is probably people rooted in different traditions and different locales. fine. that's good. that diversity is good. ayurveda for me is really developed in an Indian context where the general diet and health conditions and available herbs were quite different. i have to adapt myself to the modern world and new environments. that's all good.
but why is it so hard for us to come to a common understanding? we all use energetics. we all try to understand the individual and not just the disease. but it seems so rare we really come together and think together. for the good of our traditions and works we need to find a bridge. we need to work and think together. i wonder if anyone has really investigated or reflected on this particular issue?
but why is it so hard for us to come to a common understanding? we all use energetics. we all try to understand the individual and not just the disease. but it seems so rare we really come together and think together. for the good of our traditions and works we need to find a bridge. we need to work and think together. i wonder if anyone has really investigated or reflected on this particular issue?